O. Rodevand et al., LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS ASSESSED BY 3-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY USING ROTATIONAL ACQUISITION, Clinical cardiology, 20(11), 1997, pp. 957-962
Background: The reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) mass measurem
ent by two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography is inadequate for indivi
dual assessments. Hypothesis: This study was undertaken to evaluate th
e potential of LV mass determination with a new three-dimensional (3-D
) echocardiographic method compared with 2-D measurements. Methods: Po
t-cine agarose-filled left ventricles (n = 15, true mass 61-511 g) of
different shapes were measured by a multiplane 3-D method based on 90
images acquired by probe rotation axis (1) perpendicular and (2) paral
lel to the ventricular long axis [''parasternal'' (the left sternal bo
rder was not present as a reference point in this study) and apical vi
ews]. Mass was also obtained using (3) the biplane truncated ellipsoid
and (4) area-length methods, as well as (5) the modified cube formula
. Five hearts were not analyzed with the apical 3-D technique because
of insufficient image quality. Results: Systematic deviation from true
mass was small with all methods (<5.3%). Accuracy, expressed as 1 sta
ndard deviation of individual estimates around this systematic bias, w
as 7.7, 13.6, 8.2, 11.9, and 11.9% of true mass for the methods 1-5, r
espectively. Interobserver reproducibility, expressed as the coefficie
nt of variation, was 4.7, 8.8, 8.1, 8.9, and 9.4% for the same methods
.Conclusion: Limits fur individual accuracy and reproducibility of LV
mass estimates are nearly doubled using apical compared with ''paraste
rnal'' 3-D echocardiography in vitro. A main advantage of ''parasterna
l'' 3-D compared with 2-D LV mass estimates is better reproducibility,
but at the expense of greater time consumption. Apical 3-D technique
is not superior to simpler 2-D methods based on ''parasternal'' short
axis imaging.