Ja. Roberts et al., ELECTRON-TRANSFER WITHIN RUTHENIUM(II) POLYPYRIDYL-(SALT BRIDGE)DIMETHYLANILINE ACCEPTOR-DONOR COMPLEXES, Inorganica Chimica Acta, 263(1-2), 1997, pp. 395-405
The kinetics of electron transfer from N,N'-dimethylaniline to electro
nically excited Ru(II) polypyridyl acceptor complexes through an amidi
nium-carboxylate salt bridge have been investigated. Acceptor-(salt br
idge)-donor complexes are formed by the 1:1 association of 4,4'-X-2,2'
-bipyridine)(2)Ru-II(Mebpy-amH(+))](3+) and [(4,4'-X-2,2'-bipyridine)(
2)Ru-II(Mebpy-COO-)](+) (X = diethylcarboxy, X = H, Mebpy-amH(+) = 4-m
ethyl-4'-amidinium-2,2'-bipyridine, Mebpy-COO- = 4-methyl-4'-carboxyla
te-2,2'-bipyridine) to N,N'-dimethylaminobenzoate (DMA-COO-) and N,N'-
dimethylaminobenzamidinium (DMA-amH(+)), respectively. The design of t
he excited state structure of the Ru(II) polypyridyl complex is crucia
l to a proper kinetics study of the electron transfer reaction through
the salt bridge of these complexes. The reaction is photoinitiated by
the metal-to-ligand charge (MLCT) transfer excitation. Ester modifica
tion of the ancillary bipyridine ligands results in an MLCT excitation
that places the electron on the ligands remote to the salt bridge, cl
earing the way for very fast electron transfer from DMA into the Ru(II
) center via the salt bridge. We observe facile electron transfer when
the Ru(II) complex is attached to the amidinium-side of the salt brid
ge. This behavior is opposite to that previously observed by us for th
e oxidative quenching of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes joined to accept
ers via the same salt bridge; in this case, electron transfer out of t
he Ru(II) complex is fast. These results suggest that the quenching me
chanism of these types of Ru(II) polypyridyl assemblies is dominated b
y the orientation of the salt bridge relative to the direction of elec
tron transport. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science S.A.