IS THERE A FISH ALARM PHEROMONE - A WILD STUDY AND CRITIQUE

Citation
Ae. Magurran et al., IS THERE A FISH ALARM PHEROMONE - A WILD STUDY AND CRITIQUE, Proceedings - Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 263(1376), 1996, pp. 1551-1556
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
ISSN journal
09628452
Volume
263
Issue
1376
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1551 - 1556
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-8452(1996)263:1376<1551:ITAFAP>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
In 1938 von Frisch reported that European minnows, Phoxinus phoxinus, displayed a marked fright reaction to conspecific skin extract. This w as attributed to the presence of an alarm substance or Schreckstoff. L ater, Schreckstoff was viewed as a classic example of an alarm pheromo ne. However, Williams (1964, 1992) argued that there are considerable problems in explaining the evolution of an alarm pheromone of this typ e, and, despite being the focus of extensive research, there have been few attempts to examine the function of Schreckstoff under natural co nditions. We show that, contrary to expectation, wild European minnows fail to modify their behaviour or leave the area when exposed to skin extract. These results indicate that the minnow fright reaction is co ntext-dependent and cast further doubt on the hypothesis that Schrecks toff is an alarm pheromone.