S. Cukierman et al., PROTON CONDUCTION IN GRAMICIDIN-A AND IN ITS DIOXOLANE-LINKED DIMER IN DIFFERENT LIPID BILAYERS, Biophysical journal, 73(5), 1997, pp. 2489-2502
Gramicidin A (gA) molecules were covalently linked with a dioxolane ri
ng. Dioxolane-linked gA dimers formed ion channels, selective for mono
valent cations, in planar lipid bilayers. The main goal of this study
was to compare the functional single ion channel properties of natural
gA and its covalently linked dimer in two different lipid bilayers an
d HCl concentrations (10-8000 mM). Two ion channels with different gat
ing and conductance properties were identified in bilayers from the pr
oduct of dimerization reaction. The most commonly observed and most st
able gramicidin A dimer is the main object of this study. This gramici
din dimer remained in the open state most of the time, with brief clos
ing flickers (tau(closed)approximate to 30 mu s). The frequency of clo
sing flickers increased with transmembrane potential, making the mean
open time moderately voltage dependent (tau(open) changed approximate
to 1.43-fold/100 mV). Such gating behavior is markedly different from
what is seen in natural gA channels. In PEPC (phosphatidylethanolamine
-phosphatidylcholine) bilayers, single-channel current-voltage relatio
nships had an ohmic behavior at low voltages, and a marked sublinearit
y at relatively higher voltages. This behavior contrasts with what was
previously described in GMO (glycerylmonooleate) bilayers. In PEPC bi
layers, the linear conductance of single-channel proton currents at di
fferent proton concentrations was essentially the same for both natura
l and gA dimers. g(max) and K-D, obtained from fitting experimental po
ints to a Langmuir adsorption isotherm, were similar to 1500 pS and 30
0 mM, respectively, for both the natural gA and its dimer. In GMO bila
yers, however, proton affinities of gA and the dioxolane-dimer were si
gnificantly lower (K-D of similar to 1 and 1.5 M, respectively), and t
he g(max) higher (similar to 1750 and 2150 pS, respectively) than in P
EPC bilayers, Furthermore, the relationship between single-channel con
ductance and proton concentration was linear at low bulk concentration
s of H+ (0.01-2 M) and saturated at concentrations of more than 3 M. I
t is concluded that 1) The mobility of protons in gramicidin A channel
s in different lipid bilayers is remarkably similar to proton mobiliti
es in aqueous solutions. In particular, at high concentrations of HCl,
proton mobilities in gramicidin A channel and in solution differ by o
nly 25%. 2) Differences between proton conductances in gramicidin A ch
annels in GMO and PEPC cannot be explained by surface charge effects o
n PEPC membranes. It is proposed that protonated phospholipids adjacen
t to the mouth of the pore act as an additional source of protons for
conduction through gA channels in relation to GMO bilayers. 3) Some ex
perimental results cannot be reconciled with simple alterations in acc
ess resistance to proton flow in gA channels. Said differences could b
e explained if the structure and/or dynamics of water molecules inside
gramicidin A channels is modulated by the lipid environment and by mo
difications in the structure of gA channels. 4) The dioxolane ring is
probably responsible for the closing flickers seen in the dimer channe
l. However, other factors can also influence closing flickers.