FURTHER OBSERVATIONS TO ELUCIDATE THE ROLE OF INTERVENTRICULAR DISPERSION OF REPOLARIZATION AND EARLY AFTERDEPOLARIZATIONS IN THE GENESIS OF ACQUIRED TORSADE-DE-POINTES ARRHYTHMIAS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN ALMOKALANT AND D-SOTALOL USING THE DOG AS ITS OWN CONTROL
Sc. Verduyn et al., FURTHER OBSERVATIONS TO ELUCIDATE THE ROLE OF INTERVENTRICULAR DISPERSION OF REPOLARIZATION AND EARLY AFTERDEPOLARIZATIONS IN THE GENESIS OF ACQUIRED TORSADE-DE-POINTES ARRHYTHMIAS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN ALMOKALANT AND D-SOTALOL USING THE DOG AS ITS OWN CONTROL, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 30(6), 1997, pp. 1575-1584
Objectives. We sought to further elucidate the role of early afterdepo
larizations (EADs) and interventricular dispersion of repolarization (
Delta APD) in the genesis of acquired torsade de pointes (TdP) arrhyth
mias. Background. Administration of class III agents can be associated
with TdP. We developed a dog model in which TdP can be reproducibly i
nduced by pacing after d-sotalol. This model shows reproducible result
s over weeks. Methods. In 14 anesthetized dogs with chronic complete a
trioventricular block two separate experiments were performed in which
d-sotalol (2 mg/kg body weight) or almokalant (0.12 mg/kg) was admini
stered. Monophasic action potentials were simultaneously recorded from
the endocardium of the right and left ventricle to register EADs and
to measure the action potential duration (APD). Delta APD was defined
as the APD of the left ventricle minus that of the right ventricle. Re
sults. Baseline conditions were identical in the serially performed ex
periments. The cycle length and QT time increased by 16% and 26% after
d-sotalol and by 15% and 31% after almokalant, respectively. After bo
th drugs the action potential of the left ventricle prolonged more tha
n that of the right ventricle, thereby increasing Delta APD (almokalan
t [mean +/- SD]: 110 +/- 60 ms; d-sotalol: 80 +/- 45 ms, p < 0.05). Th
e incidence of EADs (18 of 22 vs. 11 of 24, p < 0.05) and single ectop
ic beats (EBs) (1.5 +/- 2 vs. 24 +/- 32, p < 0.01) was more frequently
observed after almokalant than after d-sotalol. Moreover, multiple EB
s only occurred after almokalant. These beats interfered with the basi
c rhythm, leading to dynamic changes in left ventricular APD and to ad
ditional increases in Delta APD. Spontaneous TdP was observed in 9 of
14 dogs after almokalant and could be increased to 12 of 14 with progr
ammed electrical stimulation. After d-sotalol, TdP could only be induc
ed by programmed electrical stimulation (5 of 14, p < 0.05). Conclusio
ns. In the same dog, almokalant induced more delay in repolarization,
more EADs, multiple EBs and more ventricular inhomogeneity in APD than
d-sotalol. These changes were related to a higher incidence of TdP an
d thereby confirm a strong association of the occurrence of EADs, mult
iple EBs and Delta APD in the genesis of TdP. These findings also show
the possible value of our model for evaluating the proarrhythmic pote
ntial of different drugs. (C) 1997 by the American College of Cardiolo
gy.