Te. Merchant et al., HIGH-DOSE-RATE INTRAOPERATIVE RADIATION-THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC SOLID TUMORS, Medical and pediatric oncology, 30(1), 1998, pp. 34-39
Background. Sixteen pediatric patients with solid tumors received trea
tment on a protocol designed to test the feasibility and safety of hig
h-dose rate intraoperative radiation therapy (IOHDR) via a remote afte
rloader. Patients and Methods. Patients with Ewing's sarcoma (n = 5),
rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 3), synovial cell sarcoma (n = 2), Wilms tumor (
n = 2), osteosarcoma, immature teratoma, desmoplastic small round cell
tumor, and inflammatory fibrosclerosis were included. IOHDR was used
in the initial management of nine pa tients and at the time of recurre
nce in seven. indications for treatment included gross residual diseas
e in 5 and suspected microscopic disease in 11. The general sites trea
ted were the abdomen (n = 3), chest-wall/thoracic cavity (n = 7), and
pelvis (n = 6). All of the patients received multiagent chemotherapy p
rior to the IOHDR procedure, and 5 had been previously treated with ex
ternal beam radiation therapy. Separate from the procedure during whic
h IORT was performed, 9 patients underwent an attempt at resection at
the time of their initial presentation. A dose of 1200 cGy was prescri
bed to a depth of 0.5 cm from the surface of a multichannel tissue-equ
ivalent applicator. Complications ascribedto IOHDR included an abscess
, delayed wound healing, and cytopenia. Four patients received supplem
ental external beam radiation therapy to the IOHDR site. At the time o
f IOHDR, 3 patients had disseminated disease within the pleural cavity
and one had pulmonary metastases. Results. With a median follow-up of
18 months, the actuarial rates of local control, metastasis-free, and
overall survival at 2 years were 61%, 51%, and 54%, respectively. The
patterns of failure were local (n = 1), distant (n = 1), and local distant (n = 1). Two patients are alive with active disease. Nine are
alive with no evidence of disease and the remaining 5 are dead from di
sease (n = 2), other causes (n = 1), OF treatment (n = 2). Conclusions
. The potential to improve local control with high doses of radiation
should be balanced against the risk of late effects. The ability to co
nfine the dose of radiation to the primary site and decrease the dose
to normal tissues makes IOHDR an important adjunct to external beam ra
diation therapy. IOHDR can be a safe and integral component in the man
agement of pediatric solid tumors. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.