RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION-THERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT WARFARIN FOR LIMITED-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP-B STUDY
Lh. Maurer et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION-THERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT WARFARIN FOR LIMITED-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP-B STUDY, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(11), 1997, pp. 3378-3387
Purpose: Studies by the Veterans Administration Cooperative Studies pr
ogram and Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) suggested that the addit
ion of warfarin to chemotherapy knight enhance response and/or surviva
l in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This randomized study evaluated th
e effect of warfarin with chemotherapy and radiation therapy in limite
d-stage SCLC. Patients and Methods: patients were randomized to receiv
e warfarin or no warfarin. All patients received three cycles of doxor
ubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (ACE). Cycles 4 and 5 (cisplat
in, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide [PCE]) were given concurrently wit
h radiation therapy, Three cycles of ACE were given after chemoradiati
on therapy, but were discontinued due to ct high rate of pulmonary tox
icity. Results: There were no significant differences in response rate
s, survival, failure-free survival, disease-free survival, or patterns
of relapse between the warfarin-treated ansi control groups, in patie
nts treated according to the initial design, an increase in failure-fr
ee survival seen with warfarin treatment approached significance (P =
.07), Preamendment results, while not significant, did not have superi
mposable treatment survival curves. a landmark analysis at 8 months sh
owed a median survival time after the landmark for complete responders
of 33 months with warfarin treatment compared with less than or equal
to 13.75 months for complete or partial responders not treated with w
arfarin (P = .05). Differences between the complete responders in this
preamendment population were not significant (P = .103), Conclusion:
Warfarin does not appear to improve outcome significantly-in limited-s
tage SCLC. However, the differences in some variables between populati
ons before the protocol amendment correspond to the favorable effects
of anticoagulants observed in previous studies. (C) 1997 by American S
ociety of Clinical Oncology.