Objectives: To investigate whether the rate of progression to AIDS has
changed over lime by testing an effect of the year of seroconversion
on AIDS onset (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1987 revised
classification), next to an effect of the calendar period of follow-u
p. Design: French multicentre prospective study of 385 homosexual and
heterosexual subjects and 231 subjects from a multicentre study of Eur
opean injecting drug users (IDU), all with a documented dale of HIV-1
seroconversion. Method: The effect of the year of seroconversion was c
ompared by the log-rank test. Crude and adjusted relative hazard (ARH)
were quantified using the Cox model. Calendar period of follow-up was
studied separately for sexual exposure group and IDU and treated as a
rime-dependent variable in a Cox model. Results: In the 616 study sub
jects the year of seroconversion was not significantly related re AIDS
occurrence (n = 108): the ARH was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI),
0.56-1.38] for those who seroconverted in 1988-1989, and 1.17 (95% CI
, 0.61-2.25) for those who seroconverted after 1989, compared with tho
se who seroconverted before 1988. In the sexual exposure group, a clea
r trend rewards less rapid progression to AIDS was observed in subject
s followed in 1991-1992 (ARH, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99) and after 1992
(ARH, 0.54; 95% CI; 0.24-1.21), compared with those followed before 19
91. This favorable trend was not observed in IDU despite a significant
decrease over time of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia as AIDS-defining
illness. Conversely to sexual exposure groups, the frequency of antir
etroviral treatment (mainly zidovudine) prescription was still low dur
ing the most recent calendar periods in IDU when tile CD4 co-int thres
hold of 200 x 10(6)/l was reached. Conclusions: No evidence was found
of a change in the rate of progression to AIDS in subjects who serocon
verted ir recent years. Furthermore, conversely to sexual exposure gro
ups, the lack of favorable trends in IDU users followed in recent year
s suggest that health-care systems are not always adapted to their lif
estyles.