Chemists are used to interpreting chemistry on the basis of at most a
few molecules, although experiments are always carried out with macros
copic amounts of substances only. We first give a weak but pragmatic d
efinition of the notion of molecule. Then we show that molecules and t
he chemical bodies mentioned above are two essentially different conce
pts that do not emerge from one another by a mere scale factor as the
Avogadro constant. This is the deeper reason that molecules and chemic
al bodies have to be described within different theoretical frameworks
. The line of demarcation between these two different kinds of objects
, however, is as difficult to draw as the distinction of the scope of
quantum mechanics and its classical analog, respectively. It will turn
out that molecules are substantially classical objects because they a
ctually possess an internal spatial structure of a certain temporal st
ability. Therefore, the way molecules are usually described requires a
tailor-made (chemical) version of quantum mechanics that rests on an
extended separability theorem. The role of both superselection rules a
nd EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) correlations will be probed separatel
y.