Rj. Santen et al., ESTROGEN PRODUCTION VIA THE AROMATASE ENZYME IN BREAST-CARCINOMA - WHICH CELL-TYPE IS RESPONSIBLE, Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 61(3-6), 1997, pp. 267-271
Studies of breast tumor homogenates from women with breast cancer have
demonstrated the synthesis of estrogens in situ through the enzyme ar
omatase. The present series of investigations sought to determine whic
h cell type within the tumor is responsible for local estrogen biosynt
hesis, and whether or not the amount produced is biologically importan
t. Accordingly, we utilized an indirect immunohistochemical scoring me
thod (H-score) to determine the relative amount of enzyme present in t
umor epithelial and stromal cells. This revealed a value of 13 for tum
or stromal cells and 4.8 for the epithelial component. Contributing to
this difference is the fact that a greater percentage of cells in the
tumor were stromal (45%) than epithelial (37%). To obtain direct evid
ence that tumor stromal cells could synthesize estrogens, we isolated
and grew these cells in tissue culture. Stromal cells originating from
within the tumor could be stimulated by known enhancers of transcript
ion to produce nearly as much aromatase as is found in placental micro
somes. Stromal cells isolated from benign tissue distal to the tumor e
xhibited properties similar to those of the tumor stroma. Epithelial c
ells, in contrast, did not respond to these enhancers and had low leve
ls of aromatase basally. To obtain proof of the principle that local e
strogen synthesis can be biologically meaningful, we measured tumor ti
ssue estradiol levels and growth rates in aromatase-transfected MCF-7
cells implanted into nude mice. Local synthesis resulted in tumor leve
ls ranging from 300 to 800 pg/g and growth rates substantially higher
than in non-aromatase-containing tumors. These data suggest that tumor
stromal cells contribute the major portion of estrogen synthesized in
tumors, and that this local synthesis can increase tumor estradiol le
vels and growth rates. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.