RATIONALE, OBJECTIVES, AND INTERPRETATION OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Authors
Citation
Ec. Vamvakas, RATIONALE, OBJECTIVES, AND INTERPRETATION OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS, Journal of clinical apheresis, 12(3), 1997, pp. 130-139
Citations number
83
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology
ISSN journal
07332459
Volume
12
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
130 - 139
Database
ISI
SICI code
0733-2459(1997)12:3<130:ROAIOR>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the most definitive tool for ev aluation of the effectiveness of an intervention and can establish a c ause-and-effect relationship between an intervention and an improved d isease outcome. However, the undertaking of an RCT does not guarantee valid results, and the findings of RCTs of the same intervention are o ften discrepant. While many reported trials are of high quality, a sig nificant number have deficiencies in design, conduct, analysis, or int erpretation of results. Medical practitioners must become familiar wit h the methodology of RCTs in order to assess the validity of the repor ted findings and the relevance of the results to their own patients. T rialists must report sufficient information about the methods used se that readers can judge for themselves if the trial worked as planned. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.