This paper reviews the history of U.S. antimerger policy. This history
is divided into three periods: a period in which there was almost no
effective antimerger policy at all from 1890 up to 1959, a period of v
igorous antimerger policy from 1950 up through 1973, and a period of l
ax enforcement from 1974 to the present. The paper accounts for these
shifts in antimerger policy and discusses their effects. After reviewi
ng the logic and consequences of U.S. antimerger policy, a critique of
its premises is offered, particularly as these premises apply to the
recent era of lax enforcement. The paper closes with suggestions for a
n alternative approach to antimerger policy that is consistent with th
e empirical evidence on why mergers occur and their effects.