Cc. Lees et al., A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF PLATELET VOLUME IN HEALTHY NORMOTENSIVE WOMEN WITH BILATERAL UTERINE ARTERY NOTCHES, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 10(4), 1997, pp. 277-281
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Acoustics,"Obsetric & Gynecology","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
High uterine artery resistance characterized by bilateral notches seen
on Doppler ultrasound in the second half of pregnancy is associated w
ith an increased risk of adverse outcome related to pre-eclampsia and
intrauterine growth retardation. We sought to establish whether there
was a difference in platelet volume in healthy, normotensive women wit
h high-resistance uterine artery Doppler findings compared to those wi
th normal uterine artery Doppler findings. Forty-seven women were allo
cated prospectively into 'bilateral notch' and 'no notch' groups at co
lor Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries carried out at a mean of 2
6 weeks' gestation. The difference in platelet volume between the two
groups and the relationship of adverse outcome with raised platelet vo
lume and high-resistance uterine artery Doppler findings was investiga
ted. Twenty-three women had no evidence of uterine artery notches and
24 had bilateral uterine artery notches. Platelet volume in the women
with bilateral notches was greater than in those with no notches (8.28
fl vs. 7.46 fl; p = 0.01). However, unlike high-resistance uterine ar
tery Doppler findings, increased platelet volume was not associated wi
th adverse outcome. Uterine artery Doppler flow abnormalities have not
previously been studied in combination with hematological or biochemi
cal markers. Our findings show, for the first time, that women with bi
lateral uterine artery notches have an increased platelet volume compa
red to those with normal uterine artery Doppler findings many weeks be
fore clinical signs of pre-eclampsia or fetal growth retardation are e
vident. Women with abnormal uterine artery flow at this gestation may
have other cardiovascular and hematological differences compared to th
ose with normal flow.