Sl. Klein et al., SOCIAL-ENVIRONMENT AND STEROID-HORMONES AFFECT SPECIES AND SEX-DIFFERENCES IN IMMUNE FUNCTION AMONG VOLES, Hormones and behavior, 32(1), 1997, pp. 30-39
Testosterone has bipotential effects on male fitness; that is, it both
suppresses immune function and maintains characteristics important fo
r reproductive success. Presumably, these effects of testosterone may
be more pronounced among polygynous species because testosterone conce
ntrations are generally higher among polygynous than monogamous males.
The present study examined sex and species differences in cell-mediat
ed immunity among four arvicoline rodents. The role of mating system a
nd sex steroids in sex differences in immune function was examined in
individually housed polygynous meadow (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and mo
ntane (M. montanus) votes and monogamous prairie (M. ochrogaster) and
pine (M. pinetorum) voles in Experiment 1. No sex differences in splen
ocyte proliferation were observed among the four species and circulati
ng testosterone concentrations did not correlate with immune function
of individuals within each species. The contribution of social isolati
on to these results was examined in Experiment 2, in which meadow and
prairie voles were housed individually, or with same- or opposite-sex
conspecifics in either pairs or groups of four per cage for 28 days. O
verall, prairie voles exhibited more robust immune responses than mead
ow voles when housed in pairs or in same-sex groups. Sex differences i
n immune function were also apparent; male meadow voles had higher imm
une responses than female conspecifics when housed in pairs, whereas f
emale prairie voles had higher responses than male conspecifics when h
oused in same-sex pairs. Circulating sex steroid hormones and corticos
terone appear to mediate some, but not all, of the changes in immune f
unction evoked by differential housing conditions. Taken together, the
se results suggest that social factors have significant effects on imm
unity and should be considered in studies of sex differences in immuni
ty at both proximate and ultimate levels. (C) 1997 Academic Press.