The current conflict theory of emotion states that emotions arise at j
unctures of plans in which circumstances show the likely attainment or
nonattainment of a goal and in which those circumstances include othe
r plans and other goals. But emotions often arise from side goals rath
er than from the goal being aimed at. This article raises the question
of what a goal is and suggests that any goal statement should include
goals about a person's identity, self-definition, and cognitive devel
opment. This approach questions the sharp distinction usually drawn be
tween goal and cognitive structure and puts forward a broader view of
emotion as the awareness of important cognitive change that results fr
om the validation or invalidation of one's cognitive system or a part
of it. This view emphasizes the role of having a model of the self and
shows how emotions can be defined as beliefs about changes in belief.
This approach suggests that, just as pain monitors changes in physica
l states, so emotions monitor changes in mental states, providing high
-level information for the management of cognitions. Another function
of emotion is to identify the type and magnitude of inconsistencies be
tween two mental states in a timely manner; such identification avoids
the need for logical proof or numerical calculation.