COMPUTER-SIMULATION STUDIES OF ANISOTROPIC SYSTEMS .27. THE DIRECT PAIR CORRELATION-FUNCTION OF THE GAY-BERNE DISCOTIC NEMATIC AND ESTIMATES OF ITS ELASTIC-CONSTANTS

Citation
J. Stelzer et al., COMPUTER-SIMULATION STUDIES OF ANISOTROPIC SYSTEMS .27. THE DIRECT PAIR CORRELATION-FUNCTION OF THE GAY-BERNE DISCOTIC NEMATIC AND ESTIMATES OF ITS ELASTIC-CONSTANTS, The Journal of chemical physics, 107(18), 1997, pp. 7483-7492
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical
ISSN journal
00219606
Volume
107
Issue
18
Year of publication
1997
Pages
7483 - 7492
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9606(1997)107:18<7483:CSOAS.>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulations have been performed for a discotic liquid crys tal composed of Gay-Berne particles. On the basis of these simulations for the nematic phase, a subset of the spherical harmonic expansion c oefficients of the direct pair correlation function (DPCF) were determ ined from the pair distribution function (PDF) by solving the Ornstein -Zernike (OZ) equation, This was achieved by generalizing the Wiener-H opf factorization scheme for the numerical solution of the OZ equation . Only the expansion coefficients g(l1,l2,l)(r) (l(alpha)less than or equal to 4) of the PDF in the laboratory frame were used when solving the OZ equation; this means that the DPCF so obtained is equivalent to that for a nematic in which the director is randomly distributed. Fro m the DPCF, the scaled Oseen-Zocher-Frank, elastic constants K-11, K- 22, and K-33*, as well as the surface constant K-13*, have been calcu lated from the subset of expansion coefficients. Generally, we find th at K-33<K-11*<K-22*, in agreement with what is expected and found for discotic nematics. These results are quantitatively but not qualitati vely different from those calculated with the help of analytical appro ximations for the the same spherical harmonic expansion coefficients o f the direct pair correlation function. For example, the values of the bulk elastic constants determined via the OZ equation are about three times larger than the bulk elasticity obtained with the low density a pproximation. (C) 1997 American Institute of Physics.