H. Allmers et al., EXPOSURE TESTING WITH POWDERED LATEX GLOV ES OF 60 HEALTH-CARE WORKERS WITH LATEX ALLERGY, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 122(43), 1997, pp. 1308-1312
Background and objective: Type 1 sensitization to natural rubber latex
occurs in up to 22% of health care workers. Most sensitizations are d
ue to the use of powdered latex gloves. Work place-associated exposure
tests were performed to ascertain how frequently persons who develope
d breathing difficulties, rhinitis/conjunctivitis or obstructive respi
ratory tract illness when using powdered latex gloves are allergic to
latex. Patients and methods: 60 persons (48 women and 12 men; mean age
29 +/- 7 years) with type 1 sensitization to natural rubber latex wer
e studied. The past history was obtained through a questionnaire speci
ally designed for those with latex allergy. Diagnostic measures includ
ed pride tests with different latex allergens, measuring the concentra
tions of total and latex-specific IgE and exposure trials, related to
the work place, with powdered vinyl and latex gloves. Results: The pri
ck tests with various latex allergens produced significant skin reacti
ons in 59 subjects, 58 had latex-specific IgE antibodies (0.47 kU/l->1
00 kU/l). Exposure tests with powdered latex gloves produced rhinitis
in 55 and conjunctivitis in 38 persons, urticaria in 3 and cough in 19
. Whole-body plethysmography demonstrated a significant rise in respir
atory tract resistance in 13, a reduction in 1-second expiratory volum
e of at least 20% in 15. Abnormal values in both tests were noted in 8
subjects. Conclusion: The breathing difficulty reported by all subjec
ts was in most cases due not to bronchial obstruction but to obstructe
d nasal breathing. In cases with breathing difficulty on exposure to l
atex gloves a latex allergy should be considered as the cause. Powdere
d latex gloves present a danger to health care personnel and should no
longer be used.