DIAGNOSIS OF LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA - COMPARISON OF SPIRAL-CTAP COMBINED WITH INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPIRAL-CT AND SPIO-ENHANCED MR COMBINED WITH PLAIN MR-IMAGING
M. Strotzer et al., DIAGNOSIS OF LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA - COMPARISON OF SPIRAL-CTAP COMBINED WITH INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPIRAL-CT AND SPIO-ENHANCED MR COMBINED WITH PLAIN MR-IMAGING, Acta radiologica, 38(6), 1997, pp. 986-992
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR with an
d without SPIO (AMI-25) could replace spiral-CTAP in the staging of co
lorectal adenocarcinoma. Material and Methods: Thirty-five patients we
re studied prospectively by means of i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT,
spiral-CTAP, and MR of the liver. MR imaging was performed before and
after infusion of AMI-25. Diagnoses were compared to intraoperative f
indings (n=35) which included intraoperative ultrasound (n=21), and fo
llow-up CT (n=18). Results and Conclusion; Fifteen patients were found
to have a total number of 53 liver metastases and 43 benign lesions w
ere detected. Evaluation was performed in four different ways: 1) i.v.
contrast-enhanced spiral-CT; 2) i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT + sp
iral-CTAP; 3) plain MR; 4) plain MR + SPIO-enhanced MR. I.v. contrast-
enhanced spiral-CT, spiral-CTAP and SPIO-enhanced MR identified patien
ts with liver metastases with equal sensitivity. However, owing to its
significantly higher sensitivity, based on a lesion-by-lesion analysi
s, spiral-CTAP cannot be replaced by SPIO-enhanced MR in patients who
are to undergo liver resection. A limitation in spiral-CTAP is its rel
atively low specificity.