There exists theoretical and empirical evidence on the efficiency and
robustness of Non-negativity Restricted Least Squares combinations of
forecasts. However, the computational complexity of the method hinders
its widespread use in practice. We examine various optimizing and heu
ristic computational algorithms for estimating NRLS combination models
and provide certain CPU-time reducing implementations. We empirically
compare the combination weights identified by the alternative algorit
hms and their computational demands based on a total of more than 66,0
00 models estimated to combine the forecasts of 37 firm-specific accou
nting earnings series. The ex ante prediction accuracies of combined f
orecasts from the optimizing versus heuristic algorithms are compared.
The effects of fit sample size, model specification, multicollinearit
y, correlations of forecast errors, and series and forecast variances
on the relative accuracy of the optimizing versus heuristic algorithms
are analysed. The results reveal that, in general, the computationall
y simple heuristic algorithms perform as well as the optimizing algori
thms. No generalizable conclusions could be reached, however, about wh
ich algorithm should be used based on series and forecast characterist
ics. (C) 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.