D. Zaric et al., F-RESPONSE AND H-REFLEX FOR MONITORING NERVE BLOCK DURING EPIDURAL ANALGESIA WITH ROPIVACAINE, Anesthesia and analgesia, 78(3), 1994, pp. 495-500
The effect of a single epidural injection of ropivacaine on the motor
and sensory function controlled from the L5/S1 level was investigated
in 28 male volunteers. Concentrations of 1%, 0.75%, or 0.5% ropivacain
e, 20 mL, administered at the L2/3 level were studied. Motor function
was assessed quantitatively (measurement of muscle force by mechano-tr
ansducers), and sensory function by the pinprick method. In addition,
F response and H reflex, tests which measure the conduction velocity i
n the central parts of peripheral nerves, were used. Epidural ropivaca
ine caused dose-dependent prolongation of the latencies of both these
variables. F response latency recovered significantly later than motor
function measured by mechano-transducers in the two lower concentrati
on groups. H reflex latency recovered significantly later than sensory
function assessed by the pinprick method in all three concentration g
roups. The time needed for recovery of F and H latencies was not signi
ficantly longer than the time from epidural injection to mobilization.
At the time when the subjects could go through the mobilization proce
dure, 12 of 28 subjects were not completely recovered. In 5 of these 1
2 subjects, the H reflex latency was persistently prolonged at the end
of the investigation, long after the subjects felt ''normal'' again.
On follow-up recordings 5 mo later, the baseline latency had been rega
ined in all five subjects. We conclude that F response and H reflex la
tencies are good indicators of the inhibition of nerve impulse conduct
ion induced by epidural analgesia.