Ca. Pratt et al., CONTROVERSIES IN 3RD MOLAR SURGERY - THE NATIONAL VIEW ON REVIEW STRATEGIES, British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 35(5), 1997, pp. 319-322
A national survey was conducted to establish the current practice of p
ostoperative review of third molar surgery by the 255 fellows of the B
ritish Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, Of the 216 comp
lete responses, 134 say that they routinely reviewed all patients, whi
le 67 did not, A further 15 fellows (7%) are currently considering the
ir practice, Five (2%) stated that routine review should be compulsory
and failure to do so was medically negligent, We conclude that a poli
cy of selective rather than routine review is safe for most patients,
but if a patient is under age, mentally retarded, taking psychoactive
drugs, or has any other associated condition, then routine follow-up s
hould be undertaken.