CONTROVERSIES IN 3RD MOLAR SURGERY - THE NATIONAL VIEW ON REVIEW STRATEGIES

Citation
Ca. Pratt et al., CONTROVERSIES IN 3RD MOLAR SURGERY - THE NATIONAL VIEW ON REVIEW STRATEGIES, British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 35(5), 1997, pp. 319-322
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
ISSN journal
02664356
Volume
35
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
319 - 322
Database
ISI
SICI code
0266-4356(1997)35:5<319:CI3MS->2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
A national survey was conducted to establish the current practice of p ostoperative review of third molar surgery by the 255 fellows of the B ritish Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, Of the 216 comp lete responses, 134 say that they routinely reviewed all patients, whi le 67 did not, A further 15 fellows (7%) are currently considering the ir practice, Five (2%) stated that routine review should be compulsory and failure to do so was medically negligent, We conclude that a poli cy of selective rather than routine review is safe for most patients, but if a patient is under age, mentally retarded, taking psychoactive drugs, or has any other associated condition, then routine follow-up s hould be undertaken.