THE DEVILS ADVOCATE - A STRATEGY TO AVOID GROUPTHINK AND STIMULATE DISCUSSION IN FOCUS GROUPS

Citation
C. Macdougall et F. Baum, THE DEVILS ADVOCATE - A STRATEGY TO AVOID GROUPTHINK AND STIMULATE DISCUSSION IN FOCUS GROUPS, Qualitative health research, 7(4), 1997, pp. 532-541
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Heath Policy & Services",Nursing
Journal title
ISSN journal
10497323
Volume
7
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
532 - 541
Database
ISI
SICI code
1049-7323(1997)7:4<532:TDA-AS>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The focus group is an increasingly popular qualitative research method in health research to gain insight into complex problems. Concerns ha ve been expressed about how best to stimulate free and open discussion ; especially on controversial issues and/or when the group comprises p eople with different power and status. A potential pitfall of the focu s group technique is groupthink: the impact of censoring and conformin g as described by such social psychologists as Irving Janis. The artic le describes an evaluation of a method to reduce groupthink and stimul ate creativity and controversy in focus groups that analyzed consultat ion between an Australian federal govern ment department and its commu nities. The article recommends to researchers using focus groups the s elective use of devil's advocates to reflect different perspectives to groups, to ask questions in a different way, to introduce new questio ns, and to avoid groups arriving at premature solutions.