Rd. Battmer et al., PERFORMANCE OF THE NEW CLARION SPEECH PROCESSOR-1.2 IN QUIET AND IN NOISE, The American journal of otology, 18(6), 1997, pp. 144-146
Objective: To evaluate the benefit of the new Clarion speech processor
1.2. Study Design: Fifty-two subjects who received a Clarion cochlear
implant during 1993 and 1995 were upgraded with the new Clarion speec
h processor 1.2. All subjects were tested with a speech test battery i
n quiet and in noise, first with the 1.0 processor and 1 month later w
ith the new 1.2 processor. To avoid ceiling or floor effects, the subj
ects were divided into three groups according to their test results wi
th the Freiburger Monosyllabic Word Test (group A <10%, group B 10-50%
, and group C >50%). Results: The results indicated that all subjects
had an improvement with the new speech processor, This improvement was
statistically significant (p < 0.05) for group C in all conditions, a
nd for group B in the tests with noise. Conclusion: While the better a
nd good performers improved their test scores significantly, low perfo
rmers seemed to derive little benefit fi om the technical improvements
of the same speech processing strategy. Perhaps this group might gain
more from a different processing scheme.