Da. Gabriel et al., REVERSAL OF ANTAGONISTS - EFFECT ON ELBOW EXTENSION STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 78(11), 1997, pp. 1191-1195
Objective: To evaluate the reversal of elbow antagonists designed to f
acilitate the extensors relative to agonist-only contractions of the e
xtensors, while using a protocol previously demonstrated to result in
an increase in strength through motor learning. Design: Two-group conv
enience sample composed of healthy subjects. Setting: Clinic research
laboratory. Subjects: Twenty-eight healthy women without a history of
upper extremity injury or neurologic disorder. Measurements: Elbow ext
ension strength and endurance were measured during maximal effort isom
etric reversal of the elbow antagonists (experimental group) and elbow
extension only (control group) resistance exercise. Biceps brachii sh
ort head (BBS), triceps brachii lateral head (TLAT), and triceps brach
ii long head (TLNG) electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured conc
urrently. Results: There were no significant differences between group
s for either elbow extension strength, BBS, TLAT, or TLNG EMG activity
. The experimental and control groups exhibited a significant linear (
p < .01) and quadratic (p < .01) increase in baseline strength of 5.2N
.m (30.5%). EMG activity from each muscle group increased linearly (p
< .01) across all rest sessions, Similar results were observed for elb
ow extension strength and biceps and triceps EMG activity during fatig
ue testing. Conclusions: The reversal of antagonists technique was not
superior to agonist-only resistance exercise, nor did it interfere wi
th the acquisition of muscular strength or endurance through motor lea
rning. (C) 1997 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine an
d the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.