EFFECT OF THE INTRODUCTION OF A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE FOR FEE-PAYING A-AND-E ATTENDERS TO CONSULT THEIR GENERAL-PRACTITIONER BEFORE ATTENDINGTHE A-AND-E DEPARTMENT
Aw. Murphy et al., EFFECT OF THE INTRODUCTION OF A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE FOR FEE-PAYING A-AND-E ATTENDERS TO CONSULT THEIR GENERAL-PRACTITIONER BEFORE ATTENDINGTHE A-AND-E DEPARTMENT, Family practice, 14(5), 1997, pp. 407-410
Background. The Health (Out-Patient Charges) Regulations 1994 were des
igned to encourage those Irish patients liable for their own health ca
re costs to attend their GP before their local Accident and Emergency
(A&E) department. Such patients are referred to as General Medical Ser
vices (GMS)-ineligible. Prior to the introduction of the regulations i
n March 1994, there was a perverse financial incentive for these patie
nts to attend directly A&E departments instead of their GP. Objective.
The aim was to compare the number of GMS-ineligible patients referred
by a GP during the year before and the year after the implementation
of the Regulations. Method. This study involved the audit of all new a
ttendances to a large A&E department, for 1 year before and after the
introduction of the new regulations. The main outcome measures were th
e number of new attenders in the subsequent year, the proportion of GM
S-ineligible attenders, the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders ref
erred by a GP and the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders referred
by a GP and categorized as having neither critical nor urgent complain
ts. Results. The total number of new attenders in the year subsequent
to the introduction of the regulations was 45 302, an increase of 4.9%
on the previous year's total. The proportion of GMS-ineligible attend
ers decreased from 45.3 to 44% (-1.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI)-0.
6 to -1.9). The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders who were referr
ed by a GP increased by 2.4% (95%; CI 1.7-3.1). The proportion of GMS-
ineligible attenders, referred by a GP with complaints categorized as
neither critical nor urgent, increased by 2.5% (95%; CI 1.8-3.2). Conc
lusions. The introduction of the regulations was associated with a sma
ll, but statistically significant, reduction in the number of GMS-inel
igible patients who attended with non-emergency conditions. The propor
tion of GMS-ineligible attenders who were referred by a GP increased b
y 2.4% (95%; CI 1.7-3.1). The overall workload of the A&E department w
as, however, unaffected. Further evaluation of the effects of this red
uction on the health status of patients is required.