EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ATRIAL-PACING MODES ON ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY - IMPLICATING THE MECHANISM OF BIATRIAL PACING IN PREVENTION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
Wc. Yu et al., EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ATRIAL-PACING MODES ON ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY - IMPLICATING THE MECHANISM OF BIATRIAL PACING IN PREVENTION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION, Circulation, 96(9), 1997, pp. 2992-2996
Background Multiple-site atrial pacing has been shown to prevent recur
rence of atrial fibrillation. However, information about the mechanism
s of different atrial pacing modes in prevention of atrial fibrillatio
n was not clear. Methods and Results Forty-two patients without struct
ural heart disease were classified into group 1 and group 2 according
to absence or presence of clinical atrial fibrillation, respectively.
Atrial conduction time and electrogram width of the right posterior in
teratrial septum (RPS) were measured during drive-train stimulation (S
1) and early extrastimulation (S2). The locations of S1 were the high
right atrium (HRA), distal coronary sinus (DCS), or both sites simulta
neously. Effective refractory periods (ERPs) of the HRA and DCS were a
lso determined during S1 stimulation at each site and during biatrial
pacing. The ERPs were not different between single-site atrial pacing
and biatrial pacing. In contrast, early S2 stimulation at the HRA caus
ed greater atrial conduction delay and greater increment of electrogra
m width of the RPS in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation.
Biatrial pacing significantly reduced the conduction delay and electro
gram width of the RPS caused by HRA extrastimulation. In addition, in
17 group 2 patients, atrial fibrillation was induced by an early HRA S
2 coupled to HRA pacing. However, with the same coupling interval of S
2 at HRA only 6 of them had the arrhythmia induced during biatrial pac
ing. Furthermore, conduction delay and increase of electrogram width c
aused by early S2 at the HRA were reduced by biatrial pacing only in p
atients whose arrhythmia induction was successfully prevented by biatr
ial pacing. Conclusions Biatrial pacing reduced both the atrial conduc
tion delay and increase of electrogram width at the RPS caused by earl
y S2 at HRA, and these effects could prevent induction of atrial fibri
llation.