Methodological issues evaluating quality of implementation of drug use
prevention programs are reviewed: definition (adherence, exposure, re
invention), measurement (self-report, other's report, behavioral obser
vation), and parameters of influence (person, situation, environment).
When implementation is defined as the interaction of person, situatio
n, and environment, the ''true'' drug use prevention program effect is
established as the average of effect generated from experimental assi
gnment and program implementation. Differences between researcher and
programmer standards of implementation quality are interpreted in term
s of an efficacy/effectiveness continuum.