The general laws governing collisions between two rigid bodies when th
eir displacements are subject to certain restrictions are discussed an
d the legitimacy of using various mathematical models to describe such
collisions is considered. Two types of constraint are discussed. The
first-bilateral constraints-are conditional on one or two points of th
e body being fixed. It is shown that in the presence of dry friction t
he impact may be of the cut-off type, that is, the contact stresses do
not disappear. Conditions are obtained for cut-off impact in terms of
the geometry of the fixed points. Another peculiarity of the collisio
ns of bodies with fixed points is the change in the physical meaning o
f the coefficient of restitution: it depends on the configuration of t
he system. The second type is represented by problems of impact when t
here is a unilateral constraint-one of the bodies is supported on a ma
ssive base; it is shown that dry friction at the point of support may
lead to situations in which a solution is either non-existent or is no
n-unique, and which resemble the well-known Painleve paradoxes. The fo
llowing conclusion is reached: for an adequate description of the phen
omenon of constrained impact, allowance must be made for the complianc
e of the colliding bodies not only directly in the impact pair, but al
so at points of contact with other bodies. In the general case, the us
e of wave theory to describe constrained impact creates immense mathem
atical difficulties and one must first work with simplified deformatio
n models, which lead to systems of ordinary differential equations. Ex
amples are considered, namely the impact of a physical pendulum on a w
all and the Coriolis problem of colliding billiard balls. (C) 1997 Els
evier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.