T. Kunishima et al., A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ASPIRIN VERSUS CILOSTAZOL THERAPY AFTER SUCCESSFUL CORONARY STENT IMPLANTATION, Clinical therapeutics, 19(5), 1997, pp. 1058-1066
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is widely used t
o treat patients with ischemic heart disease, but the procedure involv
es a number of problems, including acute coronary occlusion and resten
osis. Although stents have proved useful for preventing post-PTCA rest
enosis, especially elastic recoil during the acute phase, no method ha
s yet been established to prevent restenosis caused by vascular smooth
muscle cell proliferation in the late phase. Cilostazol selectively i
nhibits the 3'5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) III (cyclic
guanosine monophosphate-inhibited PDE) of the cyclic adenosine monoph
osphate PDE family; it also has antithrombotic and vasodilating effect
s, as well as an inhibitory effect on vascular smooth muscle cell prol
iferation through PDE III inhibition. From November 1995 to March 1997
, the usefulness of cilostazol versus aspirin in preventing subacute t
hrombosis and restenosis was studied in 70 patients (55 men and 15 wom
en; 82 total lesions) who had undergone successful elective Palmaz-Sch
atz stent implantation. Patients were randomly allocated to receive as
pirin 81 mg/d (40 patients with 45 lesions) or cilostazol 200 mg/d (30
patients with 37 lesions) alone. There was no difference in patient o
r angiographic characteristics between these groups. No subacute throm
bosis, acute complications tie, death, emergent coronary artery bypass
grafting, or hemorrhagic complications), or drug side effects were fo
und in the cilostazol group. The minimal lumen diameter (mean +/- SD)
at follow-up was 1.89 +/- 1.08 mm in the aspirin group (41 lesions, 5.
63 +/- 1.74 months after stent implantation) and 2.34 +/- 0.74 mm in t
he cilostazol group (35 lesions, 5.14 +/- 1.91 months after stent impl
antation), revealing statistically significant dilatation in the cilos
tazol group. The restenosis rate was 26.8% in the aspirin group, compa
red with 8.6% in the cilostazol group; this difference was statistical
ly significant. Administration of cilostazol alone after the implantat
ion of intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stents was useful for the preventio
n of subacute thrombosis and restenosis.