FLOW-INDUCED DILATION OF RAT SOLEUS FEED ARTERIES

Citation
Jl. Jasperse et Mh. Laughlin, FLOW-INDUCED DILATION OF RAT SOLEUS FEED ARTERIES, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 42(5), 1997, pp. 2423-2427
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
ISSN journal
03636135
Volume
42
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
2423 - 2427
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-6135(1997)42:5<2423:FDORSF>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Flow-induced dilation is thought to contribute to dilation of skeletal muscle arteries and arterioles during exercise hyperemia. We sought t o determine whether rat soleus feed arteries (SFA) exhibit flow-induce d dilation and to evaluate the potential contribution of flow-induced dilation of SFA to exercise hyperemia. Rat SFA were isolated and cannu lated to allow pressure and intraluminal flow to be independently cont rolled. Intraluminal pressure was maintained at 90 cmH(2)O throughout the experiment. All SFA (n = 13) developed spontaneous tone and dilate d in response to flow. Flow of 10 and 14 mu l/min produced a 34 +/- 14 and 56 +/- 17 mu m increase above basal diameter (135 +/- 12 mu m), r espectively. Flows >14 mu l/min produced little further dilation. Maxi mum flow-induced dilation was 86 +/- 3% of passive diameter determined in calcium-free physiological saline solution. Calculated shear stres s was maintained at 4-6 dyn/cm(2) at flows of 10-20 mu l/min but incre ased at greater flows because SFA did not dilate further. To determine whether dilation in response to flows in this range may contribute to exercise hyperemia, we estimated in vivo SFA blood flows from previou sly published soleus blood flow data. Anesthetized rats are estimated to have hows of 10 mu l/min per SFA, and conscious rats are estimated to have flows of 95 (nonexercising), 153 (walking), and 225 (running) mu l/min per SFA. Corresponding shear stresses were estimated to be 26 (anesthetized), 47 (conscious, nonexercising), 75 (walking), and 111 (running) dyn/cm(2). Because estimated in vivo values for both flow an d wall shear stress are far greater than the flow and/or shear stresse s at which maximal flow-induced dilation occurs in vitro, we conclude that flow-induced dilation contributes little to dilation of SFA durin g locomotory exercise.