Michael Ruse's rejection of religious belief is questioned at two leve
ls. First, on the metaethical level of analysis, evolutionary ethics c
annot account for moral behavior that is based on a ''strong version''
of the Love Command. Second, agnosticism is discussed as a form of be
lief. Insights from religious forms of life that are inclusive, plural
istic, and expansive are contrasted with exclusivistic, closed, and fu
ndamentalist forms of religion in order to develop criteria for '' gen
uine religion. '' Theistic agnosticism is presented as a prolegomena t
o belief.