EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC AMIODARONE ON MORTALITY AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AND IN CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE - METAANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL DATA FROM 6500 PATIENTS IN RANDOMIZED TRIALS
Sj. Connolly et al., EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC AMIODARONE ON MORTALITY AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AND IN CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE - METAANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL DATA FROM 6500 PATIENTS IN RANDOMIZED TRIALS, Lancet, 350(9089), 1997, pp. 1417-1424
Background There have been 13 randomised controlled trials of prophyla
ctic amiodarone in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) or
congestive heart failure (CHF). None of these was powered to detect a
mortality reduction of about 20%. We undertook a meta-analysis, based
on data from individual patients, to provide a more sensitive and accu
rate assessment of the benefits and risks of prophylactic amiodarone.
Methods Individual data from the studies were abstracted according to
a predefined protocol. The summary odds ratios were calculated accordi
ng to standard methods. Findings There were eight post-MI and five CHF
trials; nine trials were double-blind and placebo-controlled, and fou
r compared amiodarone with usual care. 6553 patients were randomly ass
igned treatment, of which 78% were in post-MI trials and 22% in CHF tr
ials. 89% had had previous MI. The mean left-ventricular ejection frac
tion was 31%, and median frequency of ventricular premature depolarisa
tion 18 per h. Total mortality was reduced by 13% (odds ratio 0.87 [95
% CI 0.78-0.99], p=0.030) based on classic fixed-effects meta-analysis
and by 15% (0.85 [0.71-1.02], p=0.081) with the more conservative ran
dom-effects approach. Arrhythmic/sudden death was reduced by 29% (0.71
[0.59-0.85], p=0.0003). There was no effect on nonarrhythmic deaths (
1.02 [0.87-1.19], p=0.84). There was no difference in treatment effect
between post-Mi and CHF studies. The risk of arrhythmic/sudden death
in control-group patients was higher in CHF than in post-MI studies (1
0.7 vs 4.1%), and the best single predictor of risk of arrhythmic/sudd
en death among all patients was symptomatic CHF. The excess (amiodaron
e minus control) risk of pulmonary toxicity was 1% per year. Interpret
ation Prophylactic amiodarone reduces the rate of arrhythmic/sudden de
ath in high-risk patients with recent MI or CHF and this effect result
s in an overall reduction of 13% in total mortality.