This paper describes two competing discourses currently at work in the
public domain in Hong Kong during the period leading up to the change
of sovereignty in 1997. The two discourses are labelled Utilitarian a
nd Confucianist. The Utilitarian discourse is characteristic of those
who support greater democracy and autonomy for Hong Kong, while the Co
nfucianist discourse is employed by representatives of China and the p
ro-China camp in Hong Kong. The Utilitarian discourse promotes egalita
rian values and may be confrontational. The Confucianist discourse is
more hierarchical and consensus-oriented in nature. The two discourses
are illustrated by means of brief descriptions of a set of discursive
events reported in the press and by four texts: a television news ite
m, a television interview, and two newspaper articles.