G. Vonderemde et H. Bleckmann, WAVE-FORM TUNING OF ELECTRORECEPTOR CELLS IN THE WEAKLY ELECTRIC FISH, GNATHONEMUS-PETERSII, Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 181(5), 1997, pp. 511-524
Electroreceptive afferents from A- and B-electroreceptor cells of morm
yromasts and Knollenorgans were tested for their sensitivity to differ
ent stimulus waveforms in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersi
i . Both A- and B-mormyromast cells had their lowest sensitivity to a
waveform similar to the self-generated electric organ discharge (EOD)
(around 0 degrees phase-shift). Highest sensitivities, i.e. lowest res
ponse thresholds, in both A- and B-cells were measured at phase shifts
of + 135 degrees. Thus, both cell types were inversely waveform tuned
. The sensitivity of B-cells increased sharply with increasing wavefor
m distortions. Their tuning curves had a sharp minimum of sensitivity
at + 7 degrees phase shift. A-cells had a much broader waveform tuning
with a plateau level of low sensitivity from + 24 degrees to -15 degr
ees. Across a 360 degrees cycle of phase-shifts, the range of threshol
ds was 16 dB for individual B-cells and 4.5 dB for individual A-cells.
Knollenorgan afferents were tuned to 0 degrees phase-shifted EODs and
had a dynamic range of 12 dB. Lowest sensitivities were measured at a
phase shift of + 165 degrees. Experiments with computer-generated sti
muli revealed that the strong sensitivity of mormyromast B-cells of EO
D waveform distortions cannot be attributed to any of the seven wavefo
rm parameters tested. In addition, EOD stimuli must have the correct d
uration for B-cells to respond to waveform distortions. Thus, waveform
tuning appears to be based on the specific combination of several wav
eform parameters that occur only with natural EODs.