Jo. Hendley et al., EFFECT OF INHALATION OF HOT HUMIDIFIED AIR ON EXPERIMENTAL RHINOVIRUSINFECTION, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 271(14), 1994, pp. 1112-1113
Objective.-Nasal inhalation of steam has been proposed as treatment of
viral colds on the assumption that increased intranasal temperature w
ill inhibit replication of rhinovirus (RV). The effect of steam inhala
tion on RV shedding by infected volunteers was examined in this study.
Design.-Randomized controlled trial. Volunteers experimentally infect
ed with RV were treated with machine-generated humidified air, which w
as either hot (active) or at room temperature (placebo). Viral sheddin
g was assessed over the 4 days following treatment. Setting.-Local hot
el. Participants.-Twenty volunteers from the university community who
were susceptible to the challenge virus. Intervention.-Two 30-minute i
ntranasal treatments, the first at 24 hours after inoculation and the
second at 48 hours. The temperature of active vapor was 42-degrees-C t
o 44-degrees-C and of placebo vapor was 22-degrees-C. Main Outcome Mea
sures.-Viral titers in nasal washings on each of 5 days following inoc
ulation. Results.-Mean viral titers prior to the first treatment were
10(1.7) tissue culture infectious doses50 per milliliter in the active
group and 10(1.5) in the placebo group. Mean titers for the next 4 da
ys were 10(1.7), 10(1.7), 10(1.2), and 10(0.9)/mL in the active group
and 10(1.8), 10(1.9), 10(1.6, and 10(0.7)/mL in the placebo group (no
significant difference). The proportion of volunteers who shed virus o
n each day was also similar in the two groups. Conclusion.-Two nasal i
nhalation treatments with steam had no effect on viral shedding in vol
unteers with experimental RV colds.