L. Hitchins et al., IMMUNOPHENOTYPING AS A DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL TO DIFFERENTIATE LICHEN-PLANUSFROM CHRONIC GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE - DIAGNOSTIC OBSERVATIONS ON 2PATIENTS, Journal of investigative medicine, 45(8), 1997, pp. 463-468
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental","Medicine, General & Internal
Background: Lichen planus (LP) and the lichenoid variant of chronic gr
aft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) can present with similar clinical and
histological findings, The distinction, although difficult, is importa
nt both prognostically and therapeutically. The mechanism and effector
cell phenotypes have also shown to differ between the 2 entities, Whi
le the lichenoid infiltrate of LP is predominantly T lymphocytes of he
lper/inducer cell phenotype, the T suppressor/cytotoxic subset appears
to play a major role in cGVHD. The aim of this study is to determine
whether the immunophenotypic character of the lichenoid infiltrate can
aid in distinguishing the 2 entities, Methods: Biopsies were obtained
from 2 patients with lichenoid papules and a history of transplantati
on. Light microscopy revealed lichenoid inflammation in both cases cha
racterized by a band-like lymphohistiocytic infiltrate at the dermal-e
pidermal junction, Immunochemistry was performed on fresh tissue using
a panel of monoclonal antibodies including anti-CD1a, CD3, CD4, CD8,
CD16, CD20, CD28, and CD68, Results were quantitated using computer-as
sisted image analysis, Results: We found that in both cases the majori
ty of cells stained with pan T cell marker CD3+, One case demonstrated
predominantly CD4+ T cells and increased numbers of CD1a positive Lan
gerhans cells, while the lymphokine natural killer cell activity (LAK)
markers anti-CD16 and anti-CD28 were largely nonreactive. Conversely,
the second case contained predominately CD8+ lymphocytes and very few
CD1a positive Langerhans cells with abundant LAK cell anti-CD16 and a
nti-CD28 reactivity. Conclusions: Based on these findings, the former
was classified as lichen planus and the latter as lichenoid cGVHD. The
diagnoses are substantiated with clinical history and follow-up infor
mation, We conclude that immunophenotypic characteristics of the infil
trate can be a useful tool in differentiating lichenoid cGVHD from lic
hen planus.