L. Blanch et al., SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF PRONE POSITION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH ACUTE RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME, Intensive care medicine, 23(10), 1997, pp. 1033-1039
Objective: Changing the position from supine to prone is an emerging s
trategy to improve gas exchange in patients with the acute respiratory
distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the a
cute effects on gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory system mec
hanics of turning critically ill patients with ARDS from supine to pro
ne. Design: Open, prospective study Setting: General intensive care un
its. Patients: 23 patients [mean age 56 +/- 17 (SD) years] who met ARD
S criteria and had a Lung Injury Score > 2.5 (mean 3.25 +/- 0.3). Inte
rventions: The decision to turn a patient was made using a protocol ba
sed on impaired oxygenation despite the use of positive end-expiratory
tory pressure and a fractional inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 1. Measureme
nts and results: We measured gas exchange and hemodynamic variables in
all patients and in 16 patients calculated respiratory system complia
nce when they were supine and 60 to 90 min after turning them to a pro
ne position. This latter position was remarkably well tolerated, and n
o clinically relevant complications or events were detected either dur
ing turning or while prone. The partial pressure of oxygen in arterial
blood (PaO2)/FIO2 ratio improved from 78 +/- 37 mm Hg supine to 115 /- 31 mm Hg prone (p < 0.001), and intrapulmonary shunt decreased from
43 +/- 11 to 34 +/- 8 % (p < 0.001). Cardiac output and other hemodyn
amic parameters were not affected. Respiratory system compliance sligh
tly improved from 24.7 +/- 10.2 ml/cmH(2)O supine to 27.8 +/- 13.2 ml/
cmH(2)O prone (p < 0.05). An improvement in PaO2/FIO2 of more than 15
% from changing from supine to prone was found in 16 patients (respond
ers). Responders had more hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2 70 +/- 23 vs 99 +/- 53
mm Hg in non-responders, p < 0.01), more hypercapnia (partial pressure
of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (70 +/- 27 vs 64 +/- 9 mm Hg, p <
0.01), and a shorter elapsed time to the onset of ARDS and turning to
the prone position (11.8 +/- 16 vs 32.8 +/- 42 days, p < 0.01). Concl
usions: Turning critically ill, severely hypoxemic patients from the s
upine to the prone position is a safe and useful therapeutic intervent
ion. Our data suggest that prone positioning should be carried out ear
ly in the course of ARDS.