Experiments in rodents and humans have shown the ability of sunscreens
to prevent UVB-induced skin cancers. Sunscreen use has thus become pa
rt of the panoply for melanoma prevention. However, results from epide
miological investigations indicate that sunscreen use could be a risk
rather than a protective factor for melanoma. This article discusses p
ossible explanations for discrepancies between experimental and observ
ational results, suggesting that experiments did not reproduce usual h
uman behaviours towards the sunlight. Also, marketing of sunscreens fo
sters unconsidered exposure to sunlight through associating sunscreen
use to the acquisition of a 'safe suntan', or to the possibility to le
t children go naked into the sunlight without incurring sunburns. It h
as therefore been hypothesized that, because it prevents sunburn, suns
creen use allows prolonged exposure to sunlight. If this hypothesis ho
lds, modern sunscreens with high protection factor could also represen
t a threat if their use is motivated by the desire of unrestricted exp
osure to sunlight. To explore this hypothesis, the design of a retrosp
ective cohort study is presented, including children 5-7 years old, wi
th the total body naevi count as principal endpoint. This study will h
ave the opportunity to examine the qualities of modern sunscreens amon
g young children.