The objective of this study was to examine the relationships between c
ontinuous measures of ambulatory impairment in MS patients and their o
rdinal counterparts. Much of the disability caused by MS is due to amb
ulatory impairment. The Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS) and
the Ambulation Index (Al) are ordinal measures of MS severity based la
rgely on the maximal distance subjects can walk (Dmax) and the time to
walk 8 m (T8), respectively. At EDSS levels 6.0 to 7.0 and Al levels
3 to 6, scores are defined more by the use of ambulatory aids, rather
than by Dmax or T8. We determined Dmax (up to 500 m), T8, the EDSS sco
re, and the AI in 237 ambulatory MS patients. The maximal distance sub
jects could walk and T8 were strongly related to their ordinal counter
parts (Spearman r = 0.65 and 0.91, respectively), but the continuous m
easures showed considerable variability within EDSS and AI levels that
the ordinal scales did not reflect. Most of the variability occurred
at EDSS levels 6.0 to 7.0 and AI levels 3 to 6. Because the use of an
aid did not clearly predict Dmax or T8, many patients in these ranges
had better ambulatory function based on the continuous measures than t
hose with less disability according to the ordinal scales. We found th
at Dmax and T8 provide more precise information about ambulatory impai
rment in MS than do the EDSS and AI, allowing better discrimination of
differences between patients and potentially greater sensitivity to d
etect therapeutic effects in clinical trials.