THE MEASUREMENT OF AMBULATORY IMPAIRMENT IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS

Citation
Sr. Schwid et al., THE MEASUREMENT OF AMBULATORY IMPAIRMENT IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS, Neurology, 49(5), 1997, pp. 1419-1424
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00283878
Volume
49
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1419 - 1424
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-3878(1997)49:5<1419:TMOAII>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the relationships between c ontinuous measures of ambulatory impairment in MS patients and their o rdinal counterparts. Much of the disability caused by MS is due to amb ulatory impairment. The Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS) and the Ambulation Index (Al) are ordinal measures of MS severity based la rgely on the maximal distance subjects can walk (Dmax) and the time to walk 8 m (T8), respectively. At EDSS levels 6.0 to 7.0 and Al levels 3 to 6, scores are defined more by the use of ambulatory aids, rather than by Dmax or T8. We determined Dmax (up to 500 m), T8, the EDSS sco re, and the AI in 237 ambulatory MS patients. The maximal distance sub jects could walk and T8 were strongly related to their ordinal counter parts (Spearman r = 0.65 and 0.91, respectively), but the continuous m easures showed considerable variability within EDSS and AI levels that the ordinal scales did not reflect. Most of the variability occurred at EDSS levels 6.0 to 7.0 and AI levels 3 to 6. Because the use of an aid did not clearly predict Dmax or T8, many patients in these ranges had better ambulatory function based on the continuous measures than t hose with less disability according to the ordinal scales. We found th at Dmax and T8 provide more precise information about ambulatory impai rment in MS than do the EDSS and AI, allowing better discrimination of differences between patients and potentially greater sensitivity to d etect therapeutic effects in clinical trials.