COMPARING THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF REDUCING FIRE RISK TO SPOTTED OWL HABITAT IN CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

Citation
Jb. Loomis et A. Gonzalezcaban, COMPARING THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF REDUCING FIRE RISK TO SPOTTED OWL HABITAT IN CALIFORNIA AND OREGON, Forest science, 43(4), 1997, pp. 473-482
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Forestry
Journal title
ISSN journal
0015749X
Volume
43
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
473 - 482
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-749X(1997)43:4<473:CTEVOR>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
To increase the range of natural resource Values considered in the USD A Forest Service fire management analysis system, a combined telephone contact-mail booklet-telephone interview of California and New Englan d households regarding their willingness to pay for reducing fire inte nsity and acres burned in California and Oregon's spotted owl habitat located in old growth forests was performed. Using a multiple bounded dichotomous choice format, annual willingness to pay of $79 per Califo rnia household and $46 per New England household was estimated for a 2 0% reduction in acreage burned in California. For the same percentage reduction in fire in Oregon's old growth forest the value is $59 per C alifornia household and $45 per New England household. For a combined California and Oregon Program, California households would pay $95 ann ually, while New England households would pay $61. This illustrates th e importance of national programmatic valuation of the USDA Forest Ser vice's fire control program in old growth forests, rather than state b y state surveys which miss substitution effects, This analysis also de monstrates that households benefit from and support fire protection of old growth forests in states other than their own.