Pc. Schlecht et al., INTERLABORATORY AND INTRALABORATORY VARIABILITIES IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD PROFICIENCY ANALYTICAL TESTING (ELPAT) PROGRAM, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 58(11), 1997, pp. 779-786
The Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program
evaluates over 400 laboratories that perform lead measurements in pain
ts, soils, and dusts. A previous National Institute for Occupational S
afety and Health study, based on the ELPAT data over a 3-year period (
1992-1995), found no large biases among common hotplate and microwave
digestion technique, but did detect small consistent bias between two
common instrumental methods. This study expands on the earlier study b
y examining the total sample variability and its variation components
(interlaboratory and intralaboratory). A correlation model was used to
separate the variation components by estimating a variation ratio. Th
e correlation model leads to a more general approach than a sample pai
ring technique developed by Youden. This study found no significant ev
idence that the relative contribution of intralaboratory and interlabo
ratory variability to total variability charges with lead loading leve
ls. There were no significant differences in the relative contribution
of variation components among three most commonly use analytical meth
ods (combinations of sample preparation techniques and instrumental me
thods). The interlaboratory relative standard deviation is about 1.7 t
imes the intralaboratory relative standard deviation. Both variation c
omponents are important parts of total variation although the laborato
ry-to-laboratory (including analyst-to-analyst) difference is greater
than the within laboratory (including sample-to-sample) variation.