In recent years the predilection for Systems/OR practice to be underpi
nned by a single methodology has been called into question, and report
s on multimethodology projects are now filtering through into the lite
rature, This paper takes a closer look at multimethodology, It outline
s a number of different possibilities for combining methodologies, and
considers why such a development might be desirable for more effectiv
e practice, in particular by focusing upon how it can deal more effect
ively with the richness of the real world and better assist through th
e various intervention stages, The paper outlines some of the philosop
hical, cultural and cognitive feasibility issues that multimethodology
raises, It then describes a framework that can attend to the relative
strengths of different methodologies and provide a basis for construc
ting multimethodology designs. Finally it presents a systematic way of
decomposing methodologies to identify detachable elements, and the pa
per concludes by outlining aspects of an agenda for further research t
hat emerges out of the discussion, (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.