BIG VERSUS LITTLE SCIENCE - COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM PROJECTS AND INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH GRANTS

Citation
Aa. Baumeister et al., BIG VERSUS LITTLE SCIENCE - COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM PROJECTS AND INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH GRANTS, American journal of mental retardation, 102(3), 1997, pp. 211-227
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation,"Education, Special
ISSN journal
08958017
Volume
102
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
211 - 227
Database
ISI
SICI code
0895-8017(1997)102:3<211:BVLS-C>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Controversy about the amount and nature of funding for mental retardat ion research has persisted since the creation of NICHD. An issue that has aroused considerable debate, within the mental retardation researc h community as well as beyond, is distribution of funds between large group research grants, such as the program project (PO1) and the indiv idual grant (RO1). Currently within the Mental Retardation and Develop mental Disabilities Branch, more money is allocated to the PO1 mechani sm than the RO1. We compared the two types of grants, focusing on succ ess rates, productivity, costs, impact, publication practices, and out come and conducted a comparative analysis of biomedical and behavioral research. Other related issues were considered, including review proc esses and cost-effectiveness.