Ha. Sandeman et al., LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY, PETROLOGY AND AR-40-AR-39 GEOCHRONOLOGY OF THE CRUCERO SUPERGROUP, PUNO DEPARTMENT, SE PERU, Journal of South American earth sciences, 10(3-4), 1997, pp. 223-245
The Cordillera de Carabaya region of the southern Peruvian Andes prese
rves a collage of Tertiary igneous suites, including extrusive and hyp
abyssal units, that are herein assigned to the Crucero Supergroup and
Crucero Intrusive Supersuite, respectively. The supergroup consists of
two petrologically and temporally distinct assemblages, the Picotani
and the Quenamari Groups, both with silicic hypabyssal representatives
. Stratigraphic, petrologic and Ar-40-(3)9Ar geochronologic studies of
these rocks demonstrate that they are exposed in four localities, the
Quenamari, Antauta, Cayconi and Picotani volcanic fields. The Picotan
i Group incorporates a diverse assemblage of lavas and pyroclastic roc
ks, including lamprophyres (minette), medium-to high-K calc-alkaline b
asalts, shoshonites, and S-type rhyodacites and rhyolites, as well as
commingled and mixed associations of these, constituting ten mappable
formations and twelve delimited hypabyssal units. These were emplaced
over a brief interval from ca. 22-to-26 Ma. The Quenamari Group, in co
ntrast, comprises entirely silicic, strongly peraluminous suites inclu
ding, biotite + sillimanite +/- muscovite +/- andalusite +/- tourmalin
e-bearing pyroclastic units and cogenetic epizonal intrusions. These c
onstitute three distinct volcanic formations and at least 8 intrusive
bodies. Rocks of the Quenamari Group span a broad temporal interval, f
rom ca. 6.5 to 17 Ma. The rock associations of the Crucero Supergroup
are clearly distinct from time-equivalent igneous units of the calc al
kaline, Main Andean are in southern Peru, thereby implying differing g
eodynamic conditions during their genesis. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science L
td.