COMPARISON OF 4 RNA EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME VIRUS BY RT-PCR

Citation
H. Guarino et al., COMPARISON OF 4 RNA EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME VIRUS BY RT-PCR, The New microbiologica, 20(4), 1997, pp. 319-324
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
The New microbiologica
ISSN journal
11217138 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
319 - 324
Database
ISI
SICI code
1121-7138(1997)20:4<319:CO4REM>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
We compared four commercial RNA isolation methods for the extraction o f RNA from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) . The sensitivity of the methods was determined by extraction of RNA f rom serial 10-fold dilutions of PRRSV diluted in PRRSV-negative porcin e serum or in Eagle's minimal essential medium (EMEM), followed by amp lification of extracted nucleic acids by RT-PCR. The PCR products were detected in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. The QIAamp viral k it, which is based on binding of RNA to silica particles, was the most sensitive, allowing the detection of an equivalent of 10 TCID50 of vi rus in 100 mu l of serum or EMEM. The QIAamp-tissue and the TRIzol LS kits detected 100 TCID50 per 100 mu l in both diluents whereas Ultra-s pec-3 detected 100 TCID50 of virus in EMEM and 1000 TCID50 in serum. T hese results indicate that QIAamp viral kit has a higher sensitivity f or RT-PCR analysis of PRRSV.