H. Guarino et al., COMPARISON OF 4 RNA EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME VIRUS BY RT-PCR, The New microbiologica, 20(4), 1997, pp. 319-324
We compared four commercial RNA isolation methods for the extraction o
f RNA from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)
. The sensitivity of the methods was determined by extraction of RNA f
rom serial 10-fold dilutions of PRRSV diluted in PRRSV-negative porcin
e serum or in Eagle's minimal essential medium (EMEM), followed by amp
lification of extracted nucleic acids by RT-PCR. The PCR products were
detected in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. The QIAamp viral k
it, which is based on binding of RNA to silica particles, was the most
sensitive, allowing the detection of an equivalent of 10 TCID50 of vi
rus in 100 mu l of serum or EMEM. The QIAamp-tissue and the TRIzol LS
kits detected 100 TCID50 per 100 mu l in both diluents whereas Ultra-s
pec-3 detected 100 TCID50 of virus in EMEM and 1000 TCID50 in serum. T
hese results indicate that QIAamp viral kit has a higher sensitivity f
or RT-PCR analysis of PRRSV.