This paper reports a retrospective study (1979-1995) on 200 patients (
154 women and 46 men), 50-101 years old, who received medical attentio
n because of unilateral hip fracture. Nine women and four men fracture
d twice. In 75% of women and 90% of men, surgery was carried out betwe
en one and five days after fracture. A non significant greater proport
ion of women (14/154) than men (6/46) died in the first year after inj
ury (chi(2) = 3.459, P = 0.062). Survival was assessed using Cox prope
rtional hazards model, Survival was a function of age (P = 0.000) and
sex (P = 0.008). After adjustment to a common mean age (79 years), the
median survivals for men and women were 3.9 and 8.4 years, respective
ly. Controlled concurrent life-threatening diseases, the kind of fract
ure [medial (subcapital and transcervical) or lateral (inter-and subtr
ochanteric)] and the type of prosthesis (total/partial articulation re
placement) had no significant impact on survival. No differences in ev
olution were observed: 80% returned to their ambulatory status before
injury, 8.5% required walking aids and 5.5% could not walk. The overal
l information afforded by this study suggests that with worldwide impr
ovement of hip fracture outcome, the cost/effectiveness of surgical tr
eatment of hip fracture may become, from the standpoint of public heal
th investment, a favorable alternative with respect to cost/effectiven
ess of prevention-treatment measures.