K. Detjen et al., CCK-B RECEPTORS PRODUCE SIMILAR SIGNALS BUT HAVE OPPOSITE GROWTH EFFECTS IN CHO AND SWISS 3T3 CELLS, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 42(5), 1997, pp. 1449-1457
Rat cholecystokinin-B (CCK-B) receptors were transfected into Chinese
hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 (CHO-CCK-B) and Swiss 3T3 (Swiss 3T3-CCK-B) cel
ls, and the effects of receptor activation on cell proliferation and i
ntracellular signaling were investigated. CCK octapeptide (CCK-8) trea
tment had no effect on cell growth in quiescent CHO-CCK-B cells but in
hibited DNA synthesis, proliferation, and colony formation when the ce
lls were grown in fetal bovine serum (FBS). In contrast, CCK-8 stimula
ted DNA synthesis in quiescent Swiss 3T3-CCK-B cells and had no effect
when the cells were grown in FBS. These differences in growth respons
es were not due to differences in the level of receptor expression, as
similar numbers of receptors were present in both cell types. To dete
rmine whether the different growth effects were due to differences in
receptor coupling to common second messenger pathways, we investigated
the effects of CCK-8 on several known intracellular signals. In both
cell types, CCK-8 stimulated increases in intracellular Ca2+ concentra
tion and polyphosphoinositide hydrolysis with similar potencies and ef
ficacies. CCK-8 also stimulated arachidonate release from both cell ty
pes, although the potency was higher in the CHO cells. Adenosine 3',5'
-cyclic monophosphate generation was observed at high agonist concentr
ations in both cell types and was much greater in cells with higher re
ceptor density. In summary, receptor activation had opposite effects o
n growth parameters in CHO and Swiss 3T3 cells, but only minor differe
nces were observed in the characteristics of CCK-B receptor coupling t
o specific second messengers in the two cell types. Thus cellular cont
ext is a principal determinant of the biological effects of CCK-B rece
ptor activation, and differences in biological responses may occur ind
ependently of major differences in receptor coupling.