The problems that have existed between agreements to arbitrate and the
reach of the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts in cases involving debt resolutio
n have finally reached the boiling point. That ongoing conflict, says
Jeremy Harwood, has ''almost always been resolved in favor of a debtor
unwilling to abide by an arbitration agreement,'' until a 1989 case r
eversed that trend. This article traces the development of the courts'
approaches to enforcement of arbitration clauses in the bankruptcy co
ntext and highlights the need-despite recent positive rulings-for a cl
ear rule to that effect.