Burgeoning public awareness of the harmful effects of both primary and
secondary cigarette smoke has resulted in a dilemma for many employer
s. On the one hand, nonsmokers are demanding a workplace in which smok
ing is either reduced or eliminated. On the other, smokers argue that
a smoking ban is a violation of their personal rights. Employers recog
nize that they could face substantial liabilities for avoiding protect
ive action on behalf of their employees in the face of a known health
hazard. However, making unilateral changes in a smoking policy is not
without its pitfalls as well, says the author. Employers must know the
proper steps to take and should be prepared to defend their policy an
d the reasons for it to an arbitrator in the event of a challenge.