Objectives To investigate the effect of limaprost, an oral prostagland
in El (PGE1) derivative, on erectile dysfunction and to compare the ef
fects of limaprost with a Chinese herbal drug, gosyajinki-gan. Patient
s and methods The study comprised 50 consecutive patients with mild er
ectile dysfunction who showed a good erectile response to intracaverno
sal injection with 20 mu g of PGE1. Limaprost was administered to the
first 25 patients (30 mu g three times daily) and gosyajinki-gan (7.5
g three times daily) to the next 25 patients, for 8 consecutive weeks,
Patients were evaluated by their ability to achieve vaginal penetrati
on and by a subjective assessment of erectile function (penile rigidit
y and maintenance of erection) before and after the treatment, using a
self-administered questionnaire, Objective measurements (nocturnal pe
nile tumescence, NPT, values) were also evaluated. Results Eleven of t
he 24 patients who received limaprost without interruption and four of
the 24 taking gosyajinki-gan succeeded in vaginal penetration; the di
fference in the positive response rate was significant. The mean incre
ment of NPT was significantly higher with limaprost treatment, However
, all positive responders in both groups did not experience a full ere
ction. There were no side-effects in any patient except one in the lim
aprost group who developed a facial flush. Thus the treatment was mild
enough to be tolerated, Conclusion Limaprost was more effective for m
ild erectile dysfunction than was gosyajinki-gan.